Our use of cookies

We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We’d also like to set optional analytics cookies to help us improve it. We won’t set optional cookies unless you enable them. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences.

For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookie policy

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, compliance and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytics cookies

We’d like to set Google Analytics cookies to help us to improve our website by collecting and reporting information on how you use it. The cookies collect information in a way that does not directly identify anyone.

:

Unilever: Social and Human Capital Accounting

ASSESSING THE FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE UNILEVER SUSTAINABLE LIVING PLAN THROUGH PRODUCT CATEGORIZATION

WHY?

Following the launch of the USLP, there was growing internal and external pressure to be able to demonstrate and financially quantify the value that sustainability brings to the business. However, we lacked reliable data to convince investors of the commercial benefits of the plan. Internally, teams also wanted the means to produce credible, consistent and externally relevant information about how sustainability affects the business.

WHAT?

We created a new valuation methodology, toolkit and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to assess the financial impact of the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan (USLP), by using a sustainability lens to categorize products.

HOW?

We developed a methodology for categorizing products based on a ratings system. All products are assessed under the six pillars of the USLP: Health and Hygiene, Nutrition, Greenhouse Gases (GHGs), Water, Waste, and Sustainable Sourcing. A product is then rated as ‘standard’, ‘improved’ or ‘leading’.    

All products categorized as improved or leading are shortlisted as potential ‘sustainable living products’.        

Following internal approval criteria, the products then feed into our financial KPI reporting – allowing us to identify and externally report on our ‘sustainable living brands’, and compare the growth of these brands to the rest of the business.

How does the categorization apply to our health and hygiene products?   

Products within our Health and Hygiene category are determined based on the number of people reached or litres of safe drinking water provided. We have determined this as being relevant to our personal care and home care categories.

Step 1: quantify reach of each brand and compare to target for the given year.    

Step 2: categorize product as ‘standard’, ‘improved’ or ‘leading’.             

To capture and consolidate the underlying data and the information necessary we developed a new tool to perform this product categorization, with the overall outcome from the tool shown below.

 

 

 

“SUSTAINABLE LIVING BRANDS NOW REPRESENT HALF OF OUR GROWTH AND ARE GROWING TWICE AS FAST AS OUR OTHER BRANDS.”

DOWNLOAD THE FULL GUIDE

This Unilever case study has been taken from the A4S Essential Guide to Social and Human Capital Accounting. 

ABOUT OUR ESSENTIAL GUIDE SERIES

To find out more about our Essential Guide series and see other guidance follow this link

Brookfield case study

Read the Social and Human Capital Accounting worked example from Brookfield Asset Management, a member of our Canadian CFO Leadership Network. 

Accounting for Sustainability is a Charitable Incorporated Organization, registered charity number 1195467. Accounting for Sustainability is part of the King Charles III Charitable Fund Group of Charities.
Registered Office: 9 Appold Street, 8th Floor, London, EC2A 2AP